| |
Value
(points)
|
Poor
|
Fair
|
Excellent
|
|
Paper
|
60
|
|
|
|
| Grammar |
15
|
Many
spelling and punctuation errors. Awkward wording and choppy sentences.
(0-5)
|
Some
spelling and punctuation errors. Paper lacks organization.
(6-10)
|
None
to few spelling and punctuation errors. Paper flows nicely and is
very organized.
(11-15)
|
| Content/Point-of-View |
35
|
Lacks
consistency and confusion on decision of paper.
(0-10)
|
Point
is stated but not clearly supported by content in paper.
(11-25)
|
Point
is clearly stated with lots of support to back it up. Paper is interesting
to read.
(26-35)
|
| Research
Documentation |
10
|
Paper
has little to no documentation of sources used. Reader has
no idea where the author has gotten his/her information.
(0-3)
|
Author
does not properly show all of his/her documentation, although some effort
was made. Still not clear how author came up with his/her decision.
(4-7)
|
Author
clearly documents all of his.her sources. Reader can tell where the
decision in the paper came from.
(8-10)
|
|
Presentation
|
40
|
|
|
|
| Clarity/Content |
25
|
The
presentation is unorganized and the audience is confused. The presenter
does not support his/her decisions or does not make a decision.
(0-10)
|
The
presentation is somewhat organized, but lacks clear argument for his/her
decision.
(11-20)
|
The
presentation is well organized and the audience clearly understands the
presenter's point-of-view. Excellent support for decision.
(21-25)
|
| Appealing
Presentation |
15
|
Presenter
looks bored with subject and lacks enthusiasm, allowing the audience to
become bored.
(0-5)
|
Presenter
lacks some enthusiasm with the presentation. The presenter strays
off topic.
(6-10)
|
Presenter
is enthusiastic about presentation, and stays on topic the entire time.
The presenter intrigues the audience.
(11-15)
|
| Total
Points |
100
|
|
|
|